5 minutes to complete
To be eligible to complete the Perception of cognitive biases in decision making scale, individuals should have a basic understanding of decision-making processes and cognitive biases. They should also be able to reflect on their own decision-making tendencies and be able to provide honest and accurate responses to the scale's questions.
I think that options that are presented with positive words or evoke positive associations are better.
I have a high tendency to act assuming that the information I receive first is correct.
I think that the options that attract my attention more than others do will be better.
I think that the frame presented about an event/situation will reflect the content.
When I have many options, I am more likely to stick to the first option.
My feelings and intuitions do not prove me wrong.
I trust my ability to accurately predict the future.
I do not doubt the correctness of my logical deductions about my assumptions.
I stick to my original plan, even when things are not going well.
Finalizing my previous decisions, even if the results are not satisfactory, makes me think that my investments (money, time, effort, etc.) will be wasted.
I stick to my previous decision, even if I realize that another option is better.
When I invest a lot (money, time, effort, etc.) based on a decision I made before, I tend to stick with it even if I am not satisfied with the outcome.
I consider the status quo I have been in for a long time as a “safe harbor” because of a possible risk which the change may bring.
I avoid trying options that will cause a change in my life and prefer staying away from them.
New and different ideas and options make me feel anxious.
I tend to choose options that support my previous decisions rather than choose the new and different ones.
While choosing sources of information, I prioritize those that support my point of view.
I find it time-consuming and/or confusing to review sources of information that do not fit to my own truths.
I value and accept an information more readily when it comes from a source which supports my opinion.
I tend to seek information that is consistent with my present knowledge, rather than seek out and discover the new and different aspects of events.
I tend to seek validation and evidence related to my own thoughts while evaluating options.
I rely on the information that I remember more easily.
Instead of the accuracy or inaccuracy of an information which comes to my mind, I give weight to the fact that this information can be easily remembered.
Instead of gathering information about options unfamiliar to me, I emphasize the knowledge and experiences I have in my memory.
I have a strong belief in the fact that events similar to the past ones I have witnessed/experienced will occur in the future.
| Scale | Score |
|---|---|
| Never | 1 |
| Rarely | 2 |
| Frequently | 3 |
| Always | 4 |
| Subscales |
|---|
| Framing & Anchoring Bias |
| Overconfidence Bias |
| Sunk-Cost Bias |
| Status-Quo Bias |
| Confirmatory Bias |
| Availability Bias |
Discover the Perception of Cognitive Biases in Decision Making Scale, a powerful tool for assessing how cognitive biases impact decision-making processes. Gain insight into how biases can influence choices and learn how to mitigate their effects in various contexts.
The Autism Spectrum Quotient-10 (AQ-10) is a brief screening tool used to assess traits associated with autism spectrum conditions in adults. Developed by Simon Baron-Cohen and colleagues in 2001 (shortened version in 2012), it measures social skills, attention to detail, communication, and imagination. The AQ-10 is commonly used in clinical and research settings to identify individuals who may benefit from further diagnostic assessment.
The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) is used to measure an individual's tendency to regulate their emotions through cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Developed by James Gross and Oliver John in 2003, it assesses two key emotion regulation strategies and is widely used in psychological research to study emotional well-being, coping mechanisms, and mental health outcomes.
Designed as a brief, 9-item tool to assess an individual's mathematics anxiety—the tension and fear associated with math tasks—enabling quick and effective measurement. The Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS) was developed by Derek R. Hopko, Rajan Mahadevan, Robert L. Bare, and Melissa K. Hunt in 2003.
The Flourishing Scale (FS) was developed to capture a person’s eudaimonic well-being—i.e., how well individuals perceive they are functioning in meaningful and socially positive ways. Created by Ed Diener, Derrick Wirtz, William Tov, Chu Kim‑Prieto, Dong‑won Choi, Shigehiro Oishi, and Robert Biswas‑Diener in the year 2009.
The term “Risk Propensity Scale” actually refers to two distinct, widely used instruments; however, the more commonly referenced one is the Risk Propensity Scale (RPS) by Meertens and Lion (2008). Each measures a person's general tendency to take risks.
The Hypoglycemia Symptoms Checklist (HSC‑7) is a brief 7-item self-report instrument designed to quickly assess the presence and intensity of common hypoglycemia symptoms, introduced by Barry , Bouloux, & Hardiman, in 2011.
The Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI) was developed by Charles D. Spielberger and colleagues. Its main purpose is to assess the level of anxiety individuals experience in test situations.
Assess hand preference easily with the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Short Form), developed by R.C. Oldfield. This template offers a quick, validated tool for researchers and clinicians.
The Need for Cognition Scale is used to measure how much a person enjoys and engages in thinking and problem-solving activities. It was developed by John Cacioppo and Richard Petty in 1982. The scale helps researchers and educators understand individual differences in intellectual motivation and cognitive engagement
Unveil the mysteries of human mind, its capability to systemize and its correlation with neurological conditions like Autism. Stand at the intersection of psychology and neuroscience, and gather compelling insights into the human brain. The Systemizing Quotient (SQ) was developed by Simon Baron-Cohen and his colleagues at the Autism Research Centre at the University of Cambridge. It was first published in a research paper in the year 2003.
The Classical IQ Test is an assessment designed to measure general intelligence through tasks involving logical reasoning, math, language, and spatial skills, yielding a numerical IQ score
Discover your level of empathy with the Empathy Quotient test. Measure your ability to understand and share the feelings of others with this insightful assessment. The Empathy Quotient (EQ) Test was created in 2004 by Professor Simon Baron-Cohen and his colleagues at the Autism Research Centre, University of Cambridge.
Take the Oxford Risk Questionnaire to assess your risk tolerance and make informed investment decisions. The Oxford Risk Questionnaire was developed in 2012 by Oxford Risk, a company founded by Dr. Greg B. Davies and colleagues.
This verbal IQ self-assessment test is designed to help you reflect on your language and communication skills. Answer a series of simple, easy-to-understand questions about your reading, vocabulary, writing, and conversation abilities.
Join 500+ happy customers worldwide who are already using our amazing product.
This platform goes far beyond basic surveys. I’ve used it for lead generation, landing page enrichment, and even embedded videos. Everything’s easy to use, well documented, and super flexible—whether you're building forms, quizzes, or something more advanced.
Martin G.Créateur de la Méthode RashōmonI think BlockSurvey is good for short and long surveys. What I find the best is the fact that there are so many templates I can use and customize.
Ankit M.AI Analyst Team LeadUses end-to-end encryption technology that allows users to create survey forms where data is secure and private. UI looks very beautiful.
Lou F.Creative VisionaryFrom end-to-end encryption-level security and AI-generated questions to powerful logic flows and white-label domains, BlockSurvey has it all. It’s secure, innovative, and packed with features like calculations, templates, and in-app analytics. I use it to create personalized assessments for leadership training—nothing else compares.
Kim B.Founder/ President - International Leadership TrainerBlockSurvey puts privacy and security above anything else. The use of end-to-end encryption is not a gimmick as in many products; it's a core feature enabling privacy and security. The survey building tools are impeccable. I've used numerous SaaS survey tools, and nothing comes close.
Trevor L.Chief Information Security Officer (CISO)Big fan of BlockSurvey and what Wilson and the team are doing. BlockSurvey was the end-to-end encrypted product I signed up for and I love the UI, privacy, responsiveness, and transparency behind the platform. Great job all 'round and awesome to see it keep evolving.
James Longley@jameslongleyFew tools combine data confidentiality and form aesthetics like this one. The conversational design improved my response rate by 43%, and the webhook integrations made syncing to our CRM effortless. I also love how responsive and community-driven the support team is.
Kris R.Group Automation ManagerCreating surveys with BlockSurvey has been a breeze. The drag-and-drop interface is intuitive, and we’re able to collect data anonymously and securely—without intermediaries. It’s interactive, friendly, and encourages high participation while protecting user privacy. The reports are solid, and we’ve used it confidently for internal and external feedback.
Liz D.IT Support SpecialistFor our NGO, data privacy is everything—and this platform nails it. It keeps personal info fully protected while letting us design beautiful, chat-like surveys that increase engagement. Team collaboration features sealed the deal.
Luis Noel D.Director ComercialBlockSurvey is a privacy-focused platform for collecting data through forms, surveys, assessments, and quizzes. The data collection is end-to-end encrypted, and it ensures complete privacy of your audience from Big Tech. With an array of ready to use templates, it is tailored for the needs of businesses and individuals from Web 3, HR, Mental Health, Sexual Health, Activism and many sensitive areas where data collection needs protection.